Harmful effects of boxing Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Harmful effects of boxing - Essay Example All this just cannot be valid things to make us consider it as a necessary one in our life. Unless we take a broader view, the real effects of boxing cannot be understood in real sense.Is boxing really a sport This is the question that has to be focused on first. The duty of any sport is to entertain the audience and give them pleasure, but not at the cost of the participant's life. We can very well say that all sports are dangerous and boxing is one among them, but the truth is risks in the other sports are accidental, whereas in boxing the purpose of hurting is the real goal. In the name of defeating a person, the boxer actually takes the chance of injuring his opponent fatally. Looking at each men fight for their lives and getting the pleasure from it is what we are all have been doing. Is it not the worst form of entertainment It is very surprising to see how inhumane we are just as the boxers out there.We should derive happiness from sports, the games should encourage us. It sho uld give progress for individual development for both body and mind. This should be the real motive of all sports. But clearly, boxing does not seem to do this. It is just a brutal and barbaric way of human behavior that is all. The real objective of boxing is to knock the opponent to unconsciousness and then claim the title, no matter even if life is lost. In what way does it sound good Is there anything in this sport that we can implement in our life Does it teach us anything These are some questions that we all should think about. Only then we will be in a state of mind to accept the tragic nature of this savage sport. Though there are so many developments in science, technology and education, we have failed to care about certain things. One among them is boxing. We have not understood to look at it as something threatening the life of the players. We are happy to look at them thrashing and punching each other and bleeding throughout the game and with such a stupid curiosity we wait in want of more. More than the players, I personally condemn the authorities and audiences who are the real triggering force behind these boxers. If we stop considering it, things will change and slowly this game would die out in the end. To be very frank, there is nothing fruitful that we can obtain from this game. We have made ourselves to risk in unwanted activities to destroy ourselves. Boxing is one of those industries that make the life of people worst. Here humans are exploited in the name of sport. Boxing triggers our inhumane behavior and makes us act like beasts which sometimes end in killing each other. When education tries to modify human behavior, sports such as this really messes up everything and makes us loose our sense. Here are few cases from which we ourselves can witness the brutality of boxing. BOXING IS HARMING Three hundred thirty boxers have died from injuries received in the ring as per a survey taken from 1945. Though these statistics are no greater than that of football or hockey, you must remember that the very purpose of boxing is to inflict as much pain or injury to the opponent as possible. There are many causes of these boxing-related deaths, however. One cause of death among boxers is long-term diseases such as Alzheimer's or Parkinson's. One such case is that of Sugar Ray Robinson. Though he did not die directly after a boxing match, it is believed that Alzheimer's contributed to his death. He died at the age of sixty-eight in 1989.

Analysis of Medical Malpractice Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Analysis of Medical Malpractice - Case Study Example Mr. Smith signed a consent form but only agreed to the operation because Mrs. Smith had privately threatened to divorce him if he did not. ?As a result of the operation (which was competently performed), Mr. Smith’s tear drainage improved, but he suffered a side effect of poor night vision. The risk of night vision problems was 2 percent, but many doctors consider it a minor problem as it has a limited adverse effect (due to the fact that people are usually asleep at ? night) and the operation is highly effective at improving tear drainage. Mr. Smith is a taxi driver and insists that he would not have had the operation had he known the risk. He is no longer able to work at night and has suffered a loss of income. ?In July, Mr. Smith visited Dr. Zeus, his GP, complaining that his left eye was still sore. Dr. Zeus suspected cancer of the eyelid. The computers were down so Dr. Zeus wrote a note to his receptionist asking him to request a referral to a specialist for Mr. Smith, bu t the note got lost. As a result, the referral was delayed by 4 weeks. ?In August, Mr. Smith was seen by Dr. Foster who diagnosed an aggressive malignant eyelid cancer (which was unrelated to Mr. Smith’s previous tear drainage problem). Expert evidence is that symptoms of the eyelid cancer would have been visible to a reasonably competent ophthalmologist when the tear drainage surgery was performed. ...Here, within different realms of medical malpractice, each aspect of the case will be discussed. Mr. Smith—who seeks financial compensation and complains about his treatment—will be advised to point out all of the following elements to the General Medical Council. II. Negligence Basically, there are four components or criteria of negligence which must be met in order to establish that a patient has a case for medical malpractice (or any kind of tort) (Donoghue v. Stevenson, 2011, pp. 1). Donoghue v. Stevenson was a classic case in the sense that the plaintiff had found snails in her bottled beverage, and claimed that the company owed her damages due to negligence. In a similar manner, Mr. Smith has every right to be upset with not only Dr. Foster, but Mrs. Smith, Dr. Zeus, and Dr. Zeus’s obviously incompetent staff. First of all, Dr. Foster should have mentioned that there was a 2 percent chance that his night vision might be affected. Failure to alert him to this fact is definitely negligent on his part. In addition, Mrs. Smith, his wife, is not only involving herself in the criminal behavior of blackmailing her husband to have the surgery or else divorce him—but she is also criminally liable as a tortfeasor (a person who commits a tort) because she was a consultant ophthalmologist overseeing the surgery superior to Dr. Foster, and she did not report the fact that she saw cancer on her husband’s eyelid.